[Federal] US CONGRESS CA-26: Chris Espinosa

We have been represented by a terrible establishment AIPAC shill for far too long, and we have a candidate who is anti-establishment and not beholden to the donor class.

The Ventura County DSA is proud to endorse Chris Espinosa.

Sources:

• CA DSA
• The Acorn
• ACLU
• CAIR California
• VC Star

[Federal] US CONGRESS CA-24: Helena Pasquarella

Incumbent Salud Carbajal (D) is running for his 6th term. He is an establishment democrat and has a disappointing track record for the working class. He is beholden to the donor class, with campaign contributions from organizations like AIPAC, SpaceX and Raytheon. He also accepted funds from Samuel Bankman-Fried, a cryptocurrency entrepreneur who was sentenced to 25 years in prison for defrauding billions of dollars from thousands of people.

Carbajal continuously supported Israel during the genocide in Gaza, despite multiple town halls where his constituents directly expressed their outrage to him for his inhumane positions and refusal to acknowledge the genocide. His voting record reflects that he supports the following measures:

    – Supplying billions of dollars’ worth of weapons to Israel (HR 2670 in 2023 and HR 6090 in 2024)
    – Opposing the BDS movement (HR 246 in 2019)
    – Codifying the conflation of anti-Semitism with anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel (HR 894 in 2023 and HR 6090 in 2024)
    – Censuring House Representative and DSA member Rashida Tlaib for her support of Palestinian humanity (HR 845 in 2023)

Carbajal has crossed the aisle to vote alongside MAGA republicans on several harmful bills. In 2022, while acknowledging that “a good part of the Republican Party” has transformed into an anti-democratic cult loyal to Trump, he also stated his belief in “collaborating and creating a collaborative environment” with the MAGA republicans. Here are a few examples of measures he supported in his collaboration with MAGA politicians:

    – Enabling Trump to legally receive bribes in the form of cryptocurrency (GENIUS Act in 2025)
    – Legalizing the detention/deportation of immigrants who haven’t committed any crimes (HR 3697 in 2017)
    – Expanding the power of ICE and the DHS to collect American citizens’ personal information under the guise of fighting retail theft (HR 2853, aka CORCA, in May 2026)
    – Denying gender-affirming healthcare to children (National Defense Authorization Act in 2024)
    – Denouncing socialism (House Concurrent Resolution 58 in 2025)

Carbajal has shown time and again that he prioritizes corporate interests and the donor class over the working class, has no regard for the lives of Palestinians, and is willing to help advance Trump’s agenda.

Salud Carbajal’s challenger in the Democratic Party is Sarah Bacon, a former tech executive who is currently the vice president of external affairs for UC Santa Barbara’s Graduate Student Association. This will be her first time running for office. Overall, her platform aligns reasonably well with ours and she seems sincere and competent, but in this race she’s a Democrat running on a reform ticket. We feel the Democratic party needs to be transformed or supplanted, not just reformed.

Our preferred candidate is Helena Pasquarella, a DSA member and the Director at the Department of Peace in Ojai. She previously ran in the primary for CA-24 in 2024 as a Democrat, securing 9.1% of the votes and finishing 3rd. She is the only candidate – other than incumbent -Carbajal who has previously run for office.

Pasquarella is running as a member of the Peace and Freedom Party this election cycle and has been endorsed by the Green Party of Santa Barbara. Her platform includes Medicare for all, cutting funding to Israel, immigration reform, universal rent control, defunding the police, and supporting the Green New Deal. Pasquarella has recognized that Israel is committing a genocoide in Gaza and has pledged to refuse campaign contributions from corporations and their PACs. If elected, she has said she will proudly promote the DSA ideals into her decision making in Congress.

DSA Ventura-County is proud to endorse our fellow DSA member Helena Pasquarella.

Sources:

• Santa Barbara Independent
• Vote View
• The Sacramento Bee
• Federal Office of Public Affairs – Press Release
• Reverse Canary Missions
• Daily KOS
• Brad Lander (X.com)
• ED Hat Santa Barbara

[CA State] Lieutenant Governor: Oliver Ma

(Via CA DSA)

Very much like the governor’s race, the race for lieutenant governor contains a lot of candidates that leave much to be desired. Fiona Ma, California’s State Treasurer, and Josh Fryday, one of Gruesome Gavin’s high-ranking appointees, are the main establishment candidates. Fiona Ma has the bulk of endorsements from the Californian political establishment, with politicians like incumbent Lt. Governor Eleni Kounalakis and the majority of organized labor behind her. Along with Fiona Ma’s uninspiring establishment political line, she has been accused of sexual harassment and racial discrimination by a former staffer.

Occupying the “progressive” lane is the former mayor of Stockton, Michael Tubbs. Since Tubbs’s single term as mayor, where he is most known for his attempts to implement a universal basic income (UBI) program, he has led efforts in the non-profit sphere to combat wealth inequality with his End Poverty in California (EPIC) organization. While Tubbs is certainly running as a progressive and is endorsed by members of the progressive Californian establishment like former Senator Laphonza Butler, Representatives Lateefah Simon and Robert Garcia, and Mayor of Oakland Barabara Lee, his commitment to advancing left politics is not entirely certain.

To start off with, Tubbs endorsed billionaire centrist and former NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg for president in 2020, even while democratic socialist Bernie Sanders’s campaign swept California, receiving almost 36% of the primary vote to Bloomberg’s 12%. Bernie even won Tubbs’s home of San Joaquin county. On the campaign trail, Tubbs has certainly evoked economic populism, but revealed sparingly little policy- especially policy that results in real redistribution and the elevation of workers over owners. He has also been conspicuously silent on the ever-escalating violence, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine.

Luckily, there is another choice: Oliver Ma. Oliver is CA DSA’s first-ever endorsed statewide candidate and is running on an explicitly democratic socialist platform that articulates a vision of a California that works for working people—not oligarchs and billionaires.

Oliver immigrated to California at age seven and has dedicated his career as a lawyer to protecting the rights of tenants, immigrants, and workers. As an immigrant rights attorney with the ACLU, Oliver has been on the front lines of defending Californians against ICE and the federal government’s terror campaign. When elected, he will shut down the for-profit detention centers that have proliferated across our state, ending the profits made from our exploitation.

One of the primary areas of influence of the Lieutenant Governor is over California’s higher education system. Currently, University of California schools alone have over $32 billion invested in assets tied to genocide and apartheid in Palestine. Not only is Oliver the only candidate to describe the atrocities in Gaza as genocide, he is the only candidate who has promised to divest these funds from Israel and ensure that our higher education institutions are not funding atrocities overseas.

Oliver is committed to building something that lasts beyond his campaign and, in this, building DSA statewide. Oliver understands, like all democratic socialists must, that an organized movement of working people is more than one candidate or one campaign. If you are not in DSA yet, join today and get involved with our statewide organization or in your local chapter’s work.

For more information on Oliver Ma, go to: https://oliverma2026.com/ and vote for Oliver Ma before June 2.

Candidate Recommendations

Recommendations are personal statements from members of DSA and are not elected endorsements from the chapter

[State] CA Governor – Ramsey Robinson

By T.

Opportunism and class collaboration have historically not brought about a strong socialist movement, independent organizing has. If the current situation is unique enough that we should diverge from the lessons learned by past socialist projects and change strategy, that argument has not been made. It is not the job of socialists to further empower a billionaire, to funnel people’s support into the bourgeois Democratic party, the ruling class has enough help doing this as it stands. There is a tendency among some to say that if socialists are not winning directly we should strategically align ourselves with the winning side, but in this case the winner is still capitalist exploitation. This is not just our opinion, this is a long standing socialist strategy that has seen great effect in the past.

“Even where there is no prospect of achieving their election the workers must put up their own candidates to preserve their independence, to gauge their own strength and to bring their revolutionary position and party standpoint to public attention. They must not be led astray by the empty phrases of the democrats, who will maintain that the workers’ candidates will split the democratic party and offer the forces of reaction the chance of victory. All such talk means, in the final analysis, that the proletariat is to be swindled. The progress which the proletarian party will make by operating independently in this way is infinitely more important than the disadvantages resulting from the presence of a few reactionaries in the representative body.”
-Karl Marx, 1850

Running as and voting for socialists provides valuable benefits in building visibility for socialist organizations, growing class consciousness, emphasizing organizational independence from bourgeois parties, and measuring support among the population. To frame socialists voting for a socialist candidate who represents their values as simply a “protest vote” while advocating for socialists to vote for a capitalist candidate is belittling and disrespectful to our comrades who dedicated their resources to the socialist campaigns. As Eugene Debs once said, “I would rather vote for something I want and not get it than vote for something I don’t want and get it.” If voting for a socialist, such as Ramsey Robinson of the Peace and Freedom Party, is purely a symbolic protest, then what is it called when a billionaire promises to raise taxes or arrest ICE officers? Less than symbolic, this is an empty promise. Voting socialist is only symbolic support if voting is where your organizing ends.

We understand the disagreement is not over which candidate is preferable in and of themselves, the disagreement is over which campaign is worth supporting in a race. This being said, we must understand that our endeavors do not last for one election cycle, one act of praxis does not exist independently from the others. The question we must ask ourselves is: what course of action will result in a stronger socialist movement? Voting for Steyer to further empower one of the richest, most powerful individuals in our state, or voting for Ramsey Robinson and adding momentum to California’s growing socialist movement? For many of us, the answer is solidly Ramsey Robinson. A better world is possible and that world starts with standing by what we believe in, and standing in solidarity with workers.

Vote socialist! Vote Peace and Freedom in 2026! Vote Ramsey Robinson for governor!

[State] CA Governor – Tom Steyer

By G.

The California Gubernatorial field is huge. And with the open primary system, the two candidates who receive the most votes will advance to the general election, regardless of party affiliation. As it stands, the only non-Republican candidates in position to advance are billionaire Tom Steyer and attorney Xavier Becerra. 

After Eric Slalwell resigned when accusations of sexual misconduct and alleged rape emerged, Xavier Becerra became the preferred candidate of establishment democrats. As Attorney General of California during the first Trump administration, Becerra strongly advocated for lowering the cost of medicines that were developed with taxpayer dollars. But in 2023, as Joe Biden’s Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), he completely reversed his position at the behest of pharmaceutical lobbyists and rejected a petition by prostate cancer patients to lower the cost of the medicine they needed and couldn’t afford. Becerra has refused to recognize that Israel is committing a genocide. As a member of the House of Representatives, Becerra voted to authorize the use of armed forces against Iraq (HJRES 114 in 2002). Under his watch as HHS, 85,000 migrant children went missing. Becerra pushed to move children out of shelters quickly, resulting in the loosening of protections that were in place, including the screening of sponsors. Several of these kids were subjected to child labor in places like slaughterhouses, which resulted in cases of severe injuries and death. Becerra refused to take accountability for his failures. Becerra’s endorsements include Julia Brownley and Salud Carbajal, two Zionist supporting politicians. He has also received the maximum campaign endorsement from Chevron and has doubled down on receiving their support. 

Tom Steyer has a far more progressive platform than Becerra. Despite being a billionaire, he has stated his commitment to be a class traitor and advocate against his financial interests, including supporting the California Billionaire Tax that will be on the ballot. He supports the abolishment of ICE, calling them a violent extremist group. Steyer’s anti-ICE position goes beyond rhetoric. He has a 5-step plan to prosecute ICE agents if elected governor. Steyer supports Medicare for All and has been endorsed by CAIR and the Bernie Sanders organization Our Revolution.

But there are some red flags that immediately stand out. He is a billionaire who made his wealth in horrible ways. He founded an investment firm called Farallon that invested almost $90 million in a private prison company that runs the largest ICE detention centers in California. It is something he has acknowledged and says he regrets. Steyer also used his hedge fund to finance fossil fuel projects. Today he claims to be a climate change activist and has tried to distance himself from Farallon but he never fully cut ties with the firm he founded. Steyer has stopped short of acknowledging that Israel is committing a genocide and has stated that the focus should be on Iran rather than holding Israel accountable for their crimes against humanity. But he has condemned AIPAC, saying there’s no place for dark money in politics.

In an ideal world, socialist Ramsey Robinson would be the leading candidate. But unfortunately, he has no chance of winning. The reality is that the only viable candidates to oppose Steve Hilton, the pro-ICE Republican candidate, are Steyer and Becerra, neither of whom deserve the endorsement of DSA. That being said, I will be voting for Tom Steyer because his platform is far more progressive. He has not been endorsed by oil lobbyists and Zionists like Becerra has. It’s a matter of public record that Becerra has capitulated to the capital class over the working class when given power in government. And while Steyer has many flaws, he has pledged to run on a progressive platform that includes taxing billionaires, abolishing ICE, housing first initiatives, advocating for trans rights, and Medicare for all. It remains to be seen if Tom Steyer will follow through on his commitment to be a class traitor, but his platform is far superior to Becerra’s, and I would much rather Steyer be the candidate to oppose Hilton.